Panyang Xu's profile

Design 100 PAPER CRAFTING

Digital Analog
Pan Yang Xu 

On 11/03/2024, we received our latest task for the DES 100 course, which involves crafting a 3D project independently using Rhino. The challenge entails designing a 3D object within Rhino 7, then transferring it onto 3A papers in 2D format, followed by folding it to simulate a realistic presentation.

Initially, I found myself in unfamiliar territory as I had never delved into Rhino or undertaken any projects using it. To bridge this gap, I embarked on a journey of learning through Hans' courses on Canvas, absorbing the fundamentals of Rhino. Additionally, I devoted time to experimenting with various shapes within Rhino to acquaint myself with its functionalities, aiming to bolster my skills and confidently tackle the assignment ahead.

With insights gleaned from Hans' lectures, I commenced crafting these graphics within Rhino. Armed with a rudimentary grasp of Rhino's operations, I am poised to embark on this assignment with greater ease and efficiency, confident in my ability to navigate through the remainder of the project.


I did model testing with three geometries.
1. Angular Geometry (Gladiator)
2. Triangular pyramid and cylinder combination (Christmas tree)
3.Cylinder block

Eventually I settled on the first angular geometry model, I liked the way it looked axially symmetrical, like a crown. After confirming my idea, I immediately made the following model on Rhino.


I then scaled the model to fit a 400mm^3 cube and extended it using UnrollSrf. The resulting large number of individual parts stretched beyond the grid, which posed a challenge in organizing them for printing and assembling them into a paper model without having to label each part individually, as the printer cannot make 3D models, so I did this in a later step. The Lieutenant General will continue to improve the deviation of the proportion.


This is every puzzle piece generated after unwrapping them.

After getting these shaped pieces of the module, I noticed that they were missing connectors to hold them together. For this reason, I decided to add sticky sections to make it easier to glue them together.


I made three triangles with only slightly different geometry so that I could observe its flaws and enjoy the transformation.

Plan view display:


And now I gonna try to glue them------

First Draft------

Unfortunately, my initial design attempts failed to live up to the standards I had set for myself, which clearly went against the meticulousness I strive for in my work. Despite my careful planning, the presence of miscalculations and incorrect annotations affected the accuracy of the angles, preventing the seamless application of the paper to the model. This setback highlighted not only the importance of meticulous attention to detail, but also the challenges inherent in the design process.

Additionally, my efforts to achieve design excellence encountered additional obstacles due to my limited familiarity with software operation. As I navigated through the complex design software, I encountered unexpected difficulties that resulted in unexpected damage to the exterior of the model. This experience was a stark reminder of the learning curve of mastering new tools and techniques in the design world.

Despite these obstacles, I never hesitate to pursue perfection and improvement. Recognizing the need to recalibrate my approach, I worked on improving the placement of annotations on the model and increasing my proficiency in using design software. Through persistence and a commitment to continuous learning, I believe I will overcome these challenges and produce a more refined and successful final design.


Second Attempt------

The second iteration of my model was a significant improvement compared to the initial version. However, despite these advances, certain challenges remain. One of the issues is that although the angle of the top triangle has been improved there is a big problem with the connection between the base of the triangle and the block, which detracts from the overall aesthetics of the design and affects the visual appeal of the model.

Additionally, while the overall accuracy of angles has been improved in this version, there are still subtle differences. These slight deviations, although subtle, can reduce the accuracy and coherence of the design.

Reflecting on these challenges, I am reminded of the iterative nature of the design process. Each release provides opportunities for improvement and enhancement as I continue to iterate and address any remaining flaws. Going forward, I am committed to exploring alternative methods of paste application and improving angle calculation methods to ensure that subsequent iterations of the model achieve the level of excellence and accuracy I strive for in my work.


Third Attempt------

With the third iteration of the design, significant strides have been made in addressing the issues encountered in previous versions. Notably, all discrepancies in angle alignment have been rectified, and adjustments have been made to ensure seamless cohesion between the various components of the model. Despite these improvements, challenges persist, particularly concerning the lingering traces of adhesive.

Despite my meticulous efforts to mitigate the impact of adhesive residue, its presence continues to detract from the overall aesthetic appeal of the design. Moreover, as a perfectionist, I find myself acutely aware of even the slightest imperfections, and the persistence of these adhesive marks serves as a constant reminder of the need for flawless execution.

Moving forward, I am determined to explore alternative adhesive solutions and refining my application techniques to achieve a cleaner, more polished finish. Additionally, I will continue to scrutinize every aspect of the design, striving for perfection in every detail. While the journey towards perfection may be fraught with challenges, I am committed to pushing the boundaries of excellence and realizing the full potential of my design.


Final Attempt----

The main challenge: The school's printer couldn't print the size required for the assignment, so I had to use a splicing method to print out the graphics I needed.

I used the collage method to divide my model puzzle into four A3-sized pieces of paper so that I could make a model that meets the required size.


The four pieces of paper printed out really confused me, but based on the graphic comparison, I slightly cropped out the unnecessary blank parts and put together the puzzle I needed on the cardboard.

I glued them together with a non-marking glue which kept me from having false movements when cutting.


After that I cut out the pieces of the puzzle I needed and finally glued them on successfully.

Here are the images of my production process (Final prototype):


Prototype for Final attempt showing below:


Conclusion for this assignment:

In conclusion, the journey through this assignment has been one of continuous learning and refinement. From the initial struggles with calculations and adhesive application to the eventual triumphs of aligning angles and improving cohesion between components, each iteration has brought new insights and challenges. Despite encountering setbacks such as adhesive residue and minor discrepancies, the process has been invaluable in honing my skills and deepening my understanding of design principles.

Through perseverance and a commitment to excellence, I have overcome obstacles and made significant strides towards achieving the desired outcome. While the pursuit of perfection may be ongoing, I am proud of the progress made and the lessons learned throughout this assignment. Looking ahead, I am eager to apply these newfound skills and insights to future projects, confident in my ability to tackle challenges and strive for excellence in all endeavors.

Design 100 PAPER CRAFTING
Published:

Owner

Design 100 PAPER CRAFTING

Published:

Creative Fields