FISSION: Fashion Against War
FISSION is a clothing line that protests the use of the sciences as a weapon of war. Paying homage to the classic "Smoking Kills" ad, this design says "Splitting Kills". This is in reference to nuclear fission which is a reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits into two or more smaller nuclei. The fission process often produces gamma photons, and releases a very large amount of energy. This was what made the atomic bombs that were dropped in WWII possible. The vision of FISSION is to bring scientific knowledge to the wearer in a fun and stylish way whilst protesting the atrocities of war and the misuse of knowledge.
Also in the line...
These two designs are some fun iterations I came up with of Einstein's famous formula E=mc2. They're some of the initial concepts I had when coming up with the graphic tee design. I suppose they can be a part of the FISSION line!
While doing a bit of research on the equation I came across this article on the spiritual implications of E=mc2...
"...in E=mc2 we have E for energy, c for light which is also energy and m for mass which is also just a way of carrying energy and is ultimately not solid but a mass of vibrating particles and space, all of which are energy. In essence, this equation is therefore simply saying ‘everything is energy’.
Energy is the fundamental reality of the world we live in. There is no such thing as solid matter – it is a complete illusion to think there is.
Einstein himself said:
“Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.”
Matter is just energy in a more dense form or slower vibration and matter is just another form of the same fundamental nature of all of life – energy.
The physicist David Bohm stated it thus:
‘Ultimately, the entire universe (with all its particles, including those constituting human beings, their laboratories, observing instruments, etc.) has to be understood as a single undivided whole, in which analysis into separately and independently existent parts has no fundamental status.’ 2
So why, over 100 years after E=mc2 was formulated, are we still ignoring the implications of this equation?
Thanks For Checking Out My Work!
